Its all here. Links to the glowing LA Times report from 1999 that I highlighted in my last post, and a new more damning link that (I DUG UP, no thank you TOP TIER BLOGS!) shows to what lengths Liberals were willing to use the Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae piggy banks to buy votes for life from large swathes of under qualified would-be "homeowners". Read: Human debris who felt "entitled" to a 3 /2 with a view.
Via the National Low Income Housing Coalition, November 16, 2007, in a memo to "members":
If you go on to read this memo in its entirety, it explains in PLAIN ENGLISH the lengths to which the Democrats in Congress were willing to go to get these Liberal policies codified. How thrilled these little special interest groups seem with their new found fiat money. They can barely contain their glee!!! The Socialist's Dream: The American Dream financed by taxpayers!
"REQUIREMENTS".
My blood is past boil. I think it has evaporated right out my eyes.
If you click on this document, you can read it all. You will be IN.SANE. when you are done.
I googled this. Why won't everyone? This is the Information Age and we are about to elect a buffoon that we know the least about of any candidate in history.
A computer in every home and the most ignorant electorate in history. Why am I surprised that Dancing With The Stars will get more viewers than any Presidential debate?
Many thanks for your clarifying efforts, Jane! Further, I thought McCain's move to suspend the campaign was correct; while Obama is trying to bone up on his bamboozling rhetoric to survive a debate, JM has the AUDACITY to GO WORK the problem (i.e., "The Audacity of Work"). He'd rather lose(POSTPONE) a debate than lose his country; COUNTRY FIRST.... Go Mack...
Posted by: hiredbyharoldb | September 25, 2008 at 03:01 PM
Good post, Jane.
I've booked marked for when the whole thing implodes and the witch hunts start.
hve
[JANE SAYS: Thank you kindly, Howard. Please take the facts to all the folks you know who are still relying on the Liberal Media for their information. And, honestly, I hope I am wrong. Terribly, terribly wrong.]
Posted by: Howard van Eend | September 26, 2008 at 06:15 AM