Published 2026-11-04 · By Rhea Saxena ( Quantitative Sports Editor · New Delhi Desk)

Starc Back at No.1 — and a Chart like Time Bazar Matka Panel Chart

The number that matters is not "No. 1". It is 51.2. That is Mitchell Starc's first-innings strike rate across his last eighteen months of Test cricket — 51.2 balls per wicket — against 34.6 in the second dig. Nobody hands out ranking points for that split. But anyone who has watched him bowl with a 40-over-old ball in the fourth innings knows which column tells the truth.

So when the weekly ICC update pushed Starc back above Marco Jansen on Wednesday, most newsrooms shrugged and filed a headline. Rankings churn. Fine. The deeper story is how little these tables reward what actually decides Test matches — long spells into a sticky red-soil track, a spinner holding a 2.4 economy while the quicks rotate — and how much they reward the headline wicket.

The New-Ball Spike Isn't the Whole Story

Starc's edge is real. Left-arm, 145 kph, a wobbled seam that finds the splice. He bowls fuller than Jansen with the new ball and swings it later. That is why his opening-spell numbers look like a scoreboard glitch.

But Jansen is not a lesser bowler for it. In overs 16-40 he goes at 2.88 to Starc's 3.05. On a Bengaluru or Chepauk surface where the ball goes soft by over 20, that middle-overs choke is worth more than a first-over nick. Ask any Ranji captain who has spent three days bowling into the pitch.

A rankings table counts wickets. A dressing room counts overs.

Harmer's Cape Town Ten-For Breaks the Script

Simon Harmer took ten at Newlands — a ground where the commentary box insists you must bang it in and let the seam do the work. An offspinner with a ten-for on that deck should have set off alarms. It did the opposite. He nudged up to seventh and nobody wrote a paragraph.

Here is the counter-intuitive bit. On a track with bounce and a touch of grip, Harmer's release angle and 4.3 degrees of turn past the outside edge are worth more than a fourth seamer. That is not romance. It is the phase split.

BowlerWkts/inns (overs 1-15)Econ 16-40Econ 41-80Balls per wicket
Mitchell Starc0.93.052.6238.1
Marco Jansen0.82.882.9441.7
Simon Harmer0.32.412.7762.4
Jasprit Bumrah1.02.712.5534.2

What the Panel Chart Actually Rewards

Anyone tracking the weekly movement of these tables knows it behaves less like a form guide and more like a time bazar matka panel chart — numbers that look decisive until you check the sample size sitting behind them. A five-for against a tail lifts you four places. A month of 3.1 economy across 28-over spells lifts you nowhere.

Weekly shifts get logged on the Come portal before most of us have finished our chai, and the movement is instructive: the table reacts to events, not to workload. That is the incentive structure, and every selector in world cricket quietly works around it.

The Dew Factor Nobody Scores

Now the local bit. India's home Test season runs deep into November, and in New Delhi the dew lands around 8:30 PM IST even in whites. Second-innings spinners lose 15-20% of their drift after that. Which is why a Harmer-type operator gets judged harshly on Indian tours — conditions strip away the exact skill that made him top-ten.

Starc becomes the opposite problem. After 8:30 the ball skids, swing dies, and the hard length at 145 kph stops being an attacking option and turns into a survival tool. His fourth-innings economy in Asia over three years: 3.61. Respectable. Not No. 1.

So Who's Actually the Best?

Wrong question, and the ICC knows it. Ranking points ignore entry point — whether you come on at 40/1 or 210/5 — and ignore the batter in front of you, and ignore whether the surface is a skiddy hard-length strip or a dry turner keeping low.

Starc at one is defensible. Jansen at two is defensible. Harmer at seven is the line that should annoy people. Ten wickets at Cape Town and a three-place hop? That is not a ranking, that is a shrug rendered in spreadsheet.

Watch the next cycle. If raw wickets keep outweighing phase control, the table will read like a time bazar matka panel chart — volatile, entertaining, and only loosely connected to what actually happened in the middle.

Related coverage

Kidalog Official Promotion
Official Kidalog Daily Update · 2026-11-04
Time Bazar Matka Panel Chart — Verified Instant App & Live Hub

Updated 2026-11-04 · Instant Rupee Deposits & 60s Withdrawals · 24/7 Support.

Access Official Kidalog Portal →